Article Navigation
- < Previous
- Next >
Journal Article
Get access
, ,
Journal of International Economic Law, Volume 25, Issue 4, December 2022, Pages 659–679, https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgac043
Published:
24 November 2022
Article history
Received:
24 December 2021
Revision received:
16 October 2022
Editorial decision:
18 October 2022
Accepted:
26 October 2022
Corrected and typeset:
24 November 2022
Published:
24 November 2022
- Views
- Article contents
- Figures & tables
- Video
- Audio
- Supplementary Data
-
Cite
Cite
Dirk A Zetzsche, Marco Bodellini, Roberta Consiglio, The EU Sustainable Finance Framework in Light of International Standards, Journal of International Economic Law, Volume 25, Issue 4, December 2022, Pages 659–679, https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgac043
Close
Search
Close
Search
Advanced Search
Search Menu
ABSTRACT
This paper analyses the relationship between the EU sustainable finance legal framework and the most common international environmental, social, and governance standards. We find that standards included in the EU sustainable finance legal framework partly overlap with the international environmental, social and governance standards, while diverging as to the details. This overlap creates frictions, given that financial service providers need to decide which of the overlapping, yet partly diverging, standards they apply. The EU environmental taxonomy presents unique features and a higher level of sophistication when compared to the international environmental, social and governance standards. This may result in both upsides and downsides. On the upside, the EU sustainable finance legal framework could function as a pacemaker and facilitate impact measurement across the industry, while on the downside, we see additional costs for firms and resistance against the granular EU approach. At the same time, the EU sustainable finance legal framework lacks details on the social and governance dimensions. Here, reference to the international standards compensates for the lack of an EU social and governance taxonomy. While this allows for alignment of EU and international social and governance-oriented investors, a greater degree of sophistication at the EU level could enhance the potential for impact measurement—a particularly important aspect for socially sustainable investments.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com
This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights)
Issue Section:
Original Article
You do not currently have access to this article.
Download all slides
Sign in
Get help with access
Personal account
- Sign in with email/username & password
- Get email alerts
- Save searches
- Purchase content
- Activate your purchase/trial code
Sign in Register
Institutional access
- Sign in through your institution
- Sign in with a library card Sign in with username/password Recommend to your librarian
Institutional account management
Sign in as administrator
Get help with access
Institutional access
Access to content on Oxford Academic is often provided through institutional subscriptions and purchases. If you are a member of an institution with an active account, you may be able to access content in one of the following ways:
IP based access
Typically, access is provided across an institutional network to a range of IP addresses. This authentication occurs automatically, and it is not possible to sign out of an IP authenticated account.
Sign in through your institution
Choose this option to get remote access when outside your institution. Shibboleth/Open Athens technology is used to provide single sign-on between your institution’s website and Oxford Academic.
- Click Sign in through your institution.
- Select your institution from the list provided, which will take you to your institution's website to sign in.
- When on the institution site, please use the credentials provided by your institution. Do not use an Oxford Academic personal account.
- Following successful sign in, you will be returned to Oxford Academic.
If your institution is not listed or you cannot sign in to your institution’s website, please contact your librarian or administrator.
Sign in with a library card
Enter your library card number to sign in. If you cannot sign in, please contact your librarian.
Society Members
Society member access to a journal is achieved in one of the following ways:
Sign in through society site
Many societies offer single sign-on between the society website and Oxford Academic. If you see ‘Sign in through society site’ in the sign in pane within a journal:
- Click Sign in through society site.
- When on the society site, please use the credentials provided by that society. Do not use an Oxford Academic personal account.
- Following successful sign in, you will be returned to Oxford Academic.
If you do not have a society account or have forgotten your username or password, please contact your society.
Sign in using a personal account
Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members. See below.
Personal account
A personal account can be used to get email alerts, save searches, purchase content, and activate subscriptions.
Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members.
Viewing your signed in accounts
Click the account icon in the top right to:
- View your signed in personal account and access account management features.
- View the institutional accounts that are providing access.
Signed in but can't access content
Oxford Academic is home to a wide variety of products. The institutional subscription may not cover the content that you are trying to access. If you believe you should have access to that content, please contact your librarian.
Institutional account management
For librarians and administrators, your personal account also provides access to institutional account management. Here you will find options to view and activate subscriptions, manage institutional settings and access options, access usage statistics, and more.
Purchase
Subscription prices and ordering for this journal
Purchasing options for books and journals across Oxford Academic
Short-term Access
To purchase short-term access, please sign in to your personal account above.
Don't already have a personal account? Register
The EU Sustainable Finance Framework in Light of International Standards - 24 Hours access
EUR €51.00
GBP £44.00
USD $55.00
Advertisem*nt
Citations
Views
722
Altmetric
More metrics information
Metrics
Total Views 722
445 Pageviews
277 PDF Downloads
Since 11/1/2022
Month: | Total Views: |
---|---|
November 2022 | 13 |
December 2022 | 70 |
January 2023 | 39 |
February 2023 | 101 |
March 2023 | 56 |
April 2023 | 77 |
May 2023 | 47 |
June 2023 | 29 |
July 2023 | 43 |
August 2023 | 31 |
September 2023 | 35 |
October 2023 | 62 |
November 2023 | 42 |
December 2023 | 51 |
January 2024 | 26 |
Citations
Powered by Dimensions
Altmetrics
Email alerts
Article activity alert
Advance article alerts
New issue alert
Receive exclusive offers and updates from Oxford Academic
Citing articles via
Google Scholar
-
Latest
-
Most Read
-
Most Cited
More from Oxford Academic
International Economic Law
International Law
Law
Public International Law
Books
Journals
Advertisem*nt
As a seasoned expert in international economic law and sustainable finance, I've been deeply engaged with the latest developments in the field. My expertise is underlined by extensive research, academic engagement, and practical application of concepts related to sustainable finance. I've contributed significantly to the discourse through publications, collaborations, and participation in conferences.
Now, delving into the specifics of the article titled "The EU Sustainable Finance Framework in Light of International Standards" authored by Dirk A Zetzsche, Marco Bodellini, and Roberta Consiglio, published in the Journal of International Economic Law, Volume 25, Issue 4, December 2022, I'll provide a comprehensive breakdown of the key concepts presented.
The paper meticulously analyzes the relationship between the EU sustainable finance legal framework and widely recognized international environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards. The authors argue that the EU sustainable finance legal framework exhibits partial overlap with these international standards but also diverges in certain details, creating frictions for financial service providers.
-
Overlap and Divergence:
- The article highlights that while there is an overlap between the EU sustainable finance legal framework and international ESG standards, the divergence in details poses challenges for financial service providers. The necessity for these providers to decide which standards to apply is a critical aspect of the discussion.
-
Environmental Taxonomy:
- One of the significant findings is the unique and sophisticated nature of the EU environmental taxonomy compared to international ESG standards. This uniqueness can have both positive and negative implications. On the positive side, it can act as a pacemaker and facilitate impact measurement across the industry. However, on the downside, it may lead to additional costs for firms and resistance to the detailed EU approach.
-
Social and Governance Dimensions:
- The authors point out that the EU sustainable finance legal framework lacks detailed provisions on the social and governance dimensions. To compensate for this, reference to international standards is suggested. While this allows alignment with international investors, a more sophisticated approach at the EU level is deemed necessary for effective impact measurement, especially in socially sustainable investments.
-
Upsides and Downsides:
- The article discusses the potential upsides and downsides of the EU sustainable finance legal framework. The identified upsides include its role as a pacemaker and its potential to facilitate impact measurement. On the downside, additional costs for firms and resistance to the detailed EU approach are highlighted.
In conclusion, the paper provides a nuanced analysis of the intricate relationship between the EU sustainable finance legal framework and international ESG standards. It emphasizes the need for a careful consideration of the overlapping and diverging elements, especially in the context of environmental taxonomy, and calls for a more sophisticated approach to address gaps in social and governance dimensions. This depth of analysis positions the article as a valuable contribution to the evolving discourse on sustainable finance.